User Rating 0.0 ★★★★★

Total Usage 0 times

Category Text Analysis

          Words
          0
        

Characters 0

Sentences 0

Paragraphs 0

Readability & Quality

Flesch Reading Ease --

Reading Level --

Reading Time 0s

Speaking Time 0s

Weasel Words Detected 0

Keyword Density

Enter text to see keywords...

Text Details

Avg Word Len 0

Unique Words 0%

Longest Word -

Is this tool helpful?

Your feedback helps us improve.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

About

In digital content creation, precision is not a luxury; it is a requirement. Search engines penalize keyword stuffing. Social media platforms enforce hard character limits. Readers abandon content that exceeds their cognitive load capacity. This tool serves as a comprehensive text intelligence dashboard for writers, SEO professionals, and developers.

Unlike basic counters that simply tally whitespace, this engine analyzes the linguistic structure of your text. It calculates the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease to determine education level requirements. It performs N-Gram Analysis to identify repetitive two-word and three-word phrases that dilute content quality. It flags Weasel Words - vague qualifiers that weaken arguments. Whether validating a meta description against pixel width constraints or optimizing a 2,000-word pillar page for semantic density, this interface provides immediate, granular feedback.

Formulas

The tool utilizes industry-standard algorithms to quantify text complexity. These metrics assume English language sentence structures.

Flesch Reading Ease Score (F):

Higher scores indicate easier reading. A score of 60 - 70 is standard for web content.

206.835 − 1.015 × total wordstotal sentences − 84.6 × total syllablestotal words

Keyword Density (D):

Calculated for unigrams (1 word), bigrams (2 words), and trigrams (3 words).

D = N_phraseN_total − (L − 1) × 100

Where N_phrase is the count of the specific phrase, N_total is the total word count, and L is the length of the n-gram (1, 2, or 3).

Reference Data

Platform / Standard	Constraint Type	Max Limit	Optimal Range	Truncation Point
Google Meta Title	SEO	60 chars	50 − 60 chars	600 px
Google Meta Desc	SEO	160 chars	150 − 160 chars	920 px
X (Twitter)	Social	280 chars	71 − 100 chars	N/A
Instagram Bio	Social	150 chars	130 − 150 chars	125 chars
Instagram Caption	Social	2200 chars	125 chars (Promo)	125 chars
LinkedIn Post	Social	3000 chars	1900 − 2000 chars	210 chars
LinkedIn Article	Social	100000 chars	1000 − 3000 words	N/A
SMS (GSM-7)	Tech	160 chars	160 chars	Multipart
SMS (UCS-2)	Tech	70 chars	70 chars	Multipart
Domain Name	Tech	63 chars	8 − 12 chars	N/A
Email Subject Line	Marketing	80 chars	41 chars	60 chars
Blog Post	Content	No Limit	1500 − 2500 words	N/A

Frequently Asked Questions

Standard SMS uses the GSM-7 encoding which allows 160 characters. However, if you use a single emoji or special character (like ç or ñ), the entire message switches to UCS-2 encoding, reducing the limit to 70 characters per segment. This tool helps you identify when you've crossed that threshold.

Search engines prioritize content that satisfies user intent quickly. If your text is too dense (Score < 30) or too simple (Score > 90) for your target audience, engagement metrics like "Time on Page" drop, indirectly signaling poor quality to ranking algorithms.

Weasel words are ambiguous qualifiers like "generally", "mostly", "virtually", or "often". They create an impression of uncertainty or avoid direct statements. Removing them makes writing more authoritative and persuasive.

We calculate speaking time based on a standard pace of 130 words per minute. This is the industry standard for audiobooks and podcasts. However, technical content with long words may take longer to articulate than conversational text.

No. All analysis happens strictly in your browser using Client-Side JavaScript. No data is sent to any server, ensuring complete privacy for sensitive documents.