User Rating 0.0
Total Usage 1 times
Is this tool helpful?

Your feedback helps us improve.

About

Energy balance dictates weight change, but macronutrient composition dictates body composition. This tool implements the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, widely considered the most accurate metabolic formula for non-obese individuals, to determine Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE). It then applies specific split protocols to partition calories into Protein, Fats, and Carbohydrates.

Precision is vital for performance. Undereating protein during a caloric deficit (Cut) leads to muscle atrophy, while insufficient fats can crash hormonal production. This calculator allows you to toggle between standard splits (e.g., 40/40/20) and specialized protocols like Ketogenic or High-Carb Performance.

IIFYM macros TDEE keto calculator bodybuilding nutrition

Formulas

We calculate Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) first. The male adjustment is + 5, while female is 161.

BMR = 10W + 6.25H 5A + S

Total expenditure (TDEE) multiplies BMR by an activity factor (α). Macros are then derived using caloric densities: Protein (4 kcal/g), Carbs (4 kcal/g), Fat (9 kcal/g).

Gfat = TDEE × %fat9

Reference Data

Split TypeProtein (%)Fats (%)Carbs (%)Best For
Balanced30%35%35%General Health
Low Carb40%40%20%Fat Loss / Satiety
Keto25%70%5%Ketosis Induction
High Protein50%20%30%Aggressive Cutting
Endurance20%20%60%Marathon/Triathlon

Frequently Asked Questions

Most people overestimate activity. "Sedentary" (Office job, little exercise) applies to the majority. "Light Activity" is 1-3 days of training. "Moderate" is 3-5 days. Choosing a level too high is the #1 reason for stalled weight loss.
For healthy individuals with no pre-existing kidney conditions, high protein intake (up to 2.2g per kg of body weight) is safe and effective for muscle retention. However, hydration must be increased to help process the urea.
A 2005 systematic review by the American Dietetic Association found Mifflin-St Jeor to be the most reliable predictive equation for resting metabolic rate, performing better than the older Harris-Benedict formula which tends to overestimate caloric needs.