Conflict Resolution Style Quiz
Professional assessment of your conflict management style (TKI Model). Features dynamic radar charts, context switching (Work/Personal), and actionable communication scripts.
Conflict is inevitable. How you handle it is optional.
- • Discover your dominant negotiation style.
- • Identify your "Shadow Style" (blind spots).
- • Get tailored scripts for difficult conversations.
Category
Question text goes here...
Your Profile: ---
Analysis...
When dealing with an aggressive peer:
---
When you need to buy time:
---
Compare your shape with a colleague's scores (0-12):
About
In high-stakes environments, the difference between a successful negotiation and a deadlock often hinges on self-awareness. This tool applies the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) logic to quantify your behavioral tendencies along two orthogonal axes: Assertiveness (focus on self) and Cooperativeness (focus on others).
Unlike basic quizzes, this system analyzes your micro-decisions across 5 distinct modes:
- Competing (The Shark): High Assertiveness, Low Cooperation.
- Collaborating (The Owl): High Assertiveness, High Cooperation.
- Avoiding (The Turtle): Low Assertiveness, Low Cooperation.
- Accommodating (The Teddy Bear): Low Assertiveness, High Cooperation.
- Compromising (The Fox): Moderate Assertiveness, Moderate Cooperation.
Use this tool to generate a visual radar chart of your profile, identify your "blind spots," and receive specific communication scripts for your next difficult conversation.
Formulas
The scoring system projects your choices onto a polar coordinate system. The normalized score S for a style k is defined as:
Where wi is the weight of the question (context-dependent) and δ is the Kronecker delta function (1 if match, 0 otherwise). The Radar Area A is calculated using the polygon area formula:
Reference Data
| Mode | Vector Space | Strategic Utility | Failure Mode (Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competing | High AssertivenessLow Cooperation | Emergency action, unpopular decisions, defense against exploitation. | Reduces team motivation; suppresses feedback; causes burnout. |
| Collaborating | High AssertivenessHigh Cooperation | Integrating solutions, learning, merging perspectives. | Analysis paralysis; fatigue; trivial matters consume too much time. |
| Compromising | Mod AssertivenessMod Cooperation | Temporary settlements; complex issues with equal power. | Loss of long-term value; "Band-Aid" solutions; cynicism. |
| Avoiding | Low AssertivenessLow Cooperation | Gathering info; cooling down; issues of low importance. | Bottlenecks; festering resentment; decision vacuums. |
| Accommodating | Low AssertivenessHigh Cooperation | Building social capital; showing reasonableness; preserving harmony. | Loss of influence; anarchy; ideas ignored. |