User Rating 0.0
Total Usage 0 times
0 / 300 characters · 0 words
Is this tool helpful?

Your feedback helps us improve.

About

A headline determines whether content gets read or ignored. Research from Copyblogger indicates 80% of visitors read the headline, but only 20% proceed to the body. This analyzer evaluates your headline across multiple dimensions: word balance ratio (proportion of common, uncommon, emotional, and power words), character and word count against optimal CTR ranges identified by Outbrain and BuzzSumo (6 - 8 words, 50 - 60 characters), sentiment polarity, readability via syllable density, and structural type classification. The composite score S weights these factors against empirically derived benchmarks. Note: this tool analyzes English-language headlines. Results approximate editorial quality. No algorithm replaces A/B testing with real audiences.

headline analyzer headline score emotional marketing value blog title analyzer headline optimizer CTR optimization SEO headline content marketing tool

Formulas

The overall headline score S is computed as a weighted sum of normalized sub-scores:

S = 0.30 B + 0.20 L + 0.15 P + 0.15 E + 0.10 R + 0.10 T

Where B = word balance score (how closely the common/uncommon/emotional/power ratio matches ideal benchmarks), L = length score (penalized quadratically outside the 6 - 8 word / 50 - 60 char window), P = power and emotional word density score, E = sentiment clarity score (strong positive or negative outperforms neutral), R = readability score derived from average syllables per word, and T = structural type bonus (listicles and how-to patterns receive higher scores). Each sub-score is normalized to the range [0, 100].

Word balance sub-score uses deviation from ideal ratios:

B = 100 14 4i=1 |ri ti| 100

Where ri is the actual ratio of category i and ti is the target ratio. Syllable count uses a vowel-cluster heuristic: count groups of consecutive vowels (a, e, i, o, u, y), subtract silent-e endings, enforce a minimum of 1 syllable per word.

Reference Data

FactorOptimal RangeWeight in ScoreSource / Benchmark
Word Count6 - 8 words20%BuzzSumo (100M headlines)
Character Count50 - 60 charsIncluded in LengthOutbrain CTR study
Common Words20 - 30%30% (combined)CoSchedule Headline Studio
Uncommon Words10 - 20%CoSchedule Headline Studio
Emotional Words10 - 15%Advanced Marketing Institute
Power Words10 - 15%CoSchedule Headline Studio
Sentiment PolarityPositive or strong negative15%Outbrain: negative superlatives +30% CTR
Power & Emotional Density20% combined15%AMI EMV Score
Readability (Syllable Density)1.5 syllables/word avg10%Flesch-Kincaid adaptation
Headline TypeHow-to, Listicle, Question10%Content Marketing Institute
Title CaseTitle Case preferredAdvisory (no weight)APA Style / AP Style
Number in HeadlinePresent = bonusIncluded in StructureConductor: +36% preference
Google SERP Display60 charsAdvisory flagGoogle SERP truncation
Email Subject Line41 charsAdvisory flagMailchimp optimal open rate
Twitter/X Post100 chars (with link)Advisory flagBuddy Media engagement study
Facebook Post Title40 charsAdvisory flagJeff Bullas CTR study

Frequently Asked Questions

Conductor research found that headlines containing numbers are preferred by 36% of readers over other headline types. Numbers set concrete expectations for content scope and reading time. The analyzer awards a structural bonus when it detects a leading numeral pattern because such headlines consistently outperform vague alternatives in CTR studies across platforms.
The CoSchedule methodology classifies every word as common, uncommon, emotional, or power. A headline using only common words ('The Way to Do Things') lacks impact. One overloaded with power words ('Incredible Shocking Ultimate Secret') feels spammy. The ideal balance is approximately 20-30% common, 10-20% uncommon, 10-15% emotional, and 10-15% power words. The analyzer penalizes deviation from these ranges proportionally.
No. Outbrain's study of 65,000 paid link headlines found that negative superlatives ('worst', "never", 'stop') generated a 30% higher CTR than positive superlatives. The analyzer rewards sentiment clarity - strong positive or strong negative both score well. Neutral, bland headlines score lowest because they fail to trigger an emotional response.
Google truncates SERP titles at approximately 580 pixels, which corresponds to roughly 50-60 characters depending on letter width. The analyzer flags headlines exceeding 60 characters with a SERP truncation warning. The headline may still score well on other metrics, but you risk losing critical words in search results. For email subject lines, the threshold drops to 41 characters (Mailchimp data).
The tool uses a vowel-cluster heuristic with silent-e correction. It handles most English words within ±1 syllable accuracy. Edge cases include borrowed words (e.g., 'résumé'), compound words, and proper nouns. For headline-length text (6-12 words), the aggregate average syllable count remains reliable. The readability sub-score contributes only 10% of the total, so minor syllable miscounts have minimal impact on the overall score.
Title Case (capitalizing major words) signals professionalism and is the dominant convention in publishing (AP Style, APA). Sentence case is acceptable for informal contexts. ALL CAPS triggers spam filters in email and reduces readability by eliminating ascender/descender variation. The analyzer detects capitalization style and provides advisory feedback but does not penalize sentence case directly in the score.
The word dictionaries (emotional, power, uncommon) are English-only. Syllable counting uses English phonetic rules. Applying this tool to non-English headlines will produce unreliable word classification and readability scores. Length-based metrics (character count, word count) remain valid across languages, but the overall score should not be trusted for non-English text.